That headline might be the toughest thing I've ever written, seeing as I'm a die-hard hockey and NHL fan.
Despite my bias towards hockey players, I understand all the uproar about NHL teams jumping the queue so their players – and in the case of the Calgary Flames, their families – could get the H1N1 flu vaccine, while the rest of the country's 'high-risk' patients stand in long lines, sometimes to be turned away because of vaccine shortages.
It's simply not fair.
Sure, NHLers, and pro athletes in general, do a lot of travelling, spend a lot of time in close quarters with each other, share water bottles, and interact with fans who could be infected with H1N1 on a daily basis. But what are the chances of an NHLer having more hand-to-hand contact with people than a cashier at a grocery store, on a daily basis?
Yeah, slim to none is right. And yet, that cashier, if they have no underlying health conditions or aren't pregnant, can't get the H1N1 shot because they're not 'high-risk'. These players are healthy, strong men who, even if they contract the disease, have very little chance of dying from it. People with underlying health conditions, children and pregnant women certainly are at greater risk of dying than men between 20 and 40 in peak physical condition.
It's elitism, and heads are rolling in Calgary already, as they should. The Toronto media has tried to turn it into a story here with our beloved Maple Leafs, but it hasn't really taken hold because the club hasn't said which of their players got the shot. Two of them – Jason Blake and Phil Kessel – currently have and recently beat cancer respectively, so they fall into the 'high-risk' category, and hopefully got their shot.
Anyway, the government is likely happy some of the venom has been re-directed away from its pathetic handling of this 'pandemic'. But can you imagine if this had been a real threat to public safety, like an epidemic that we're supposedly overdue for. Many, many of us would be dead, because our government can't roll out a proper vaccination program.
As an update to last week's well-read post about my family's battle to decide whether to vaccinate our two-year-old, we've decided to hold off for now. We can always stick the needle in her arm later, if seemingly healthy children start dying in increasingly high numbers, but we can't turn back the clock if we give her the vaccine and then something is found to be wrong with it. And Amy and I are both happy with the decision we were able to come to, once cooler heads prevailed and we stepped outside the panic-zone so many of us were in last week.
In fact, this quote from Campbellford Memorial Hospital's chief of staff Dr. Paul Williams, helped solidify the decision in my mind. It's from Thursday night's board meeting.
“I think we’ve already seen the spike,” Dr. Williams explained.
“We’ve seen this go through local schools and we’ve probably seen the biggest wave we’re going to see locally. The media and government have created this fear, but what we’ve seen so far is less severe than a regular flu season. Beyond the next couple of weeks, unless we see another wave, getting a flu vaccine at this point is almost fruitless.”
Recent Comments